#Contax g2 turn off af manual

#Contax g2 turn off af manual

Like the G1 there are single, multiple exposure, continuous (high and low speed), and timer shutter modes, but the G2 adds a second dial around the second dedicated AF button that lets you choose between single focus, continuous focus, and manual focus. The G1 has one time focus with a button to set single, timer, multiple exposure, and continuous shooting (if you are in a rush to burn through a roll) and the G2 adds more options by employing two dials. Press the backbutton with your thumb to focus, recompose and take the shot with the shutter button. On the G2 there is a dedicated backbutton focus set up. On the G1 you simply half press until you get focus and recompose. But if you are using that you should just use AF. They also have in viewfinder focus verification. They both also show a digital readout of the distance in the viewfinder and on the external LCD. Spin the wheel (on the top of the G1 and more conveniently on the front right of the G2) to вЂinfвЂ™ and keep it moving. Many have dinged the MF system, which is awkward admittedly, but it is usable for those rare occasions when you need to drive. Some say the G1 is bad and slow and the G2 is good and fast, but in my experience the G1 is good and fast, with minimal hunting under the darkest and least contrasty conditions (like many other AF systems even up until today), and the G2 is better and faster focusing even in challenging situations.

A film system with an actual usable, accurate, focus and recompose friendly AF system. Above these stellar lenses are a stellar feature set. And at these prices for an AF Zeiss portrait lens it was a no brainer.ДЄnd as I said that is just for starters. As for the 90mm I will always purchase a portrait length prime if I can afford it. Why not the highly regarded 35mm also? It sits between and too close to the 28mm and (50mm-ish) 45mm. 28, 45, 90 and Zeiss.ДЄfter much research I picked up these three lenses and soon found that everything ever written about Zeiss lenses in general and these lenses in particular is true. So good it suspended my virtual film camera shopping list until further notice.ДЇor starters three numbers and a name played a huge part in this decision.

So good that it put other film cameras on a trailer regardless of format. But the G1 was so good the G2 soon followed (both purchased from KEH.com). Initially I bought the G1 since it was such good value compared to the G2 and just about any film camera spec wise. Which one, the G1 or G2? Yes to both in my case. I will leave others such as Ken Rockwell, Wikipedia, and Camerapedia and the like to fill you in on the history. Once I had my fun I traded the Leica gear on some lenses for the digital side of my camera house that became available at my local camera shop. Now mind I did not say better, but better suited my needs. While there is only one Leica, and I appreciate its purist virtues and performance, I already had a system that better suited my needs. While I do still own the FED 2 it is a completely different animal and I kept it for the pure bang for buck novelty of it all. Was it because of the FED 2 I compared it to in that same post? Even added another lens for it that was a bona fide Leica lens (found on KEH.com), the 90mm Elmar CвЂ¦ Yeah, I no longer own any of it. If you read my last post you would know that I owned, used, fell for, and cherished the mighty and legendary Leica M3.